| Quote: |
|
Originally Posted by Strokerace
|
|
oh my god, are you fuken stupid. jesus i cant put the words together to describe what kind of a piece of uneducated hillbilly trailer trash you are. you really dont know a god damn thing about these cars so shut you fuken mouth.
first off moron, the motor in my car is a twincam, not a quad 4, quad4 hasnt been used since 95. the 3.1 liter was not used in a jbody after 1994, from there on its been all 4 banger. the 2.2, the 2.4 twin cam and the 2.2 ecotec. no where did gm evre use a v6 in them. look at my sig dumbshit, its a third gen, meaning 95- present, and im sure its been posted around that my car is infact a 2.4.
boat anchor you say? how so? the 2.4s valvetrain is good over 8000 rpm, aftermarket support allows me to buy anything, eagle h beam rds, clevite bering, arp studs, wesico and je pistons, everything is available for this motor, a fraction of that is available for the 3.1 liter.
second the 3.1 makes less power than the 2.4 and weighs more, so how is that a smart move to use that motor? come to think of it your assuming that the z24's only came with a 3.1. infact you moron, the 2.8 and 3.1 were offered in non z24/sunbird gt models for the second gen j bodies.
please do some research before talking to me about a car that i know absolutly evreything about. you sound dumber and dumber everytime you open your mouth. and this just pushed you over the edge making you sound like even more of a stupid ass sheep fuking sister groping hillbilly.
oh yes one last thing cum monkey. the newer, well let me be a little more clear on this. the 96-2002 years, the 2.4 was the only option for the z24, for anything else the crappy 2.2 took its place, after 2002 the 2.2 ecotec too kthe place of all the motors. the 2.2 ecote and the base junk 2.2 offered before them are not even close to being the same motors in any shape way or form. the ecotec in itself is a marvel of a motor andi could get into it with you and make yo ulook even dumber if you want